About
Blog
Tools
Help
Batch Analysis:
WormMine
or
SimpleMine
or
Parasite BioMart
SPELL -
Nematode
- Dataset Details
New Search
Dataset Listing
Show Expression Levels
Download Expression Data
About the Website
SPELL Version 2.0.3
Citation
Denver DR, Morris K, Streelman JT, Kim SK, Lynch M, Thomas WK. The transcriptional consequences of mutation and natural selection in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Nat Genet
, 2005.
PubMed ID
15852004
Short Description
The transcriptional consequences of mutation and natural selection in Caenorhabditis elegans.
GEO Record:
GSE4123
Platform:
GPL2646
GPL2766
GPL3096
GPL3097
GPL3098
GPL3178
GPL3399
Download gene-centric, log2 transformed data:
WBPaper00025099.ce.mr.csv
# of Conditions
49
Full Description
The evolutionary importance of gene-expression divergence is unclear: some studies suggest that it is an important mechanism for evolution by natural selection, whereas others claim that most between-species regulatory changes are neutral or nearly neutral. We examined global transcriptional divergence patterns in a set of Caenorhabditis elegans mutation-accumulation lines and natural isolate lines to provide insights into the evolutionary importance of transcriptional variation and to discriminate between the forces of mutation and natural selection in shaping the evolution of gene expression. We detected the effects of selection on transcriptional divergence patterns and characterized them with respect to coexpressed gene sets, chromosomal clustering of expression changes and functional gene categories. We directly compared observed transcriptional variation patterns in the mutation-accumulation and natural isolate lines to a neutral model of transcriptome evolution to show that strong stabilizing selection dominates the evolution of transcriptional change for thousands of C. elegans expressed sequences.
Experimental Details:
WBPaper00025099:N2-II_starting_line_vs_MA96-II_no_selection
WBPaper00025099:N2-I_starting_line_vs_PB306-I_with_selection
WBPaper00025099:N2-III_starting_line_vs_MA59-III_no_selection
WBPaper00025099:N2-II_starting_line_vs_MA59-II_no_selection
WBPaper00025099:MA41-4_A_no_selection_vs_MA24-4_B_no_selection
WBPaper00025099:MA41-3_A_no_selection_vs_MA24-3_B_no_selection
WBPaper00025099:CB4856-3_A_vs_AB1-3_B
WBPaper00025099:CB4856-4_A_vs_AB1-4_B
WBPaper00025099:N2-I_starting_line_vs_MA96-I_no_selection
WBPaper00025099:N2_vs_MA24_rep1
WBPaper00025099:N2_vs_MA24_rep2
WBPaper00025099:N2_vs_MA24_rep3
WBPaper00025099:N2_vs_MA99_rep1
WBPaper00025099:MA24-3_A_vs_N2-3_B
WBPaper00025099:N2-II_starting_line_vs_PB306-II_with_selection
WBPaper00025099:N2-III_starting_line_vs_PB306-III_with_selection
WBPaper00025099:MA24-2_B_no_selection_vs_MA41-2_A_no_selection
WBPaper00025099:MA24-1_B_no_selection_vs_MA41-1_A_no_selection
WBPaper00025099:N2-I_starting_line_vs_MA59-I_no_selection
WBPaper00025099:PB303-3_A_vs_N2-3_B
WBPaper00025099:AB1-3_A_vs_PB306-3_B
WBPaper00025099:MA83-2_B_vs_MA99-2_A
WBPaper00025099:AB1-1_B_vs_CB4856-1_A
WBPaper00025099:MA83-1_B_vs_MA99-1_A
WBPaper00025099:CB4856-2_B_vs_N2-2_A
WBPaper00025099:MA99-4_A_vs_MA83-4_B
WBPaper00025099:MA99-3_A_vs_MA83-3_B
WBPaper00025099:N2-3_A_vs_CB4856-3_B
WBPaper00025099:PB303-4_A_vs_N2-4_B
WBPaper00025099:N2_vs_MA99_rep2
WBPaper00025099:MA41-1_B_vs_MA83-1_A
WBPaper00025099:N2-4_A_vs_CB4856-4_B
WBPaper00025099:PB303-1_B_vs_PB306-1_A
WBPaper00025099:MA99_vs_N2_rep1
WBPaper00025099:MA83-4_A_vs_MA41-4_B
WBPaper00025099:AB1-2_B_vs_CB4856-2_A
WBPaper00025099:PB303-2_B_vs_PB306-2_A
WBPaper00025099:MA99_vs_N2_rep2
WBPaper00025099:MA83-3_A_vs_MA41-3_B
WBPaper00025099:PB306-4_A_vs_PB303-4_B
WBPaper00025099:N2_vs_PB303
WBPaper00025099:N2-1_B_vs_PB303-1_A
WBPaper00025099:PB306-1_B_vs_AB1-1_A
WBPaper00025099:AB1_vs_PB306-1
WBPaper00025099:MA24-4_A_vs_N2-4_B
WBPaper00025099:PB306-2_B_vs_AB1-2_A
WBPaper00025099:PB303_vs_PB306-2
WBPaper00025099:CB4856_vs_N2
WBPaper00025099:MA41_vs_MA83
.
Tags
Method: microarray, Species: Caenorhabditis elegans, Topic: natural variant